Submit a preprint

642

Random genetic drift sets an upper limit on mRNA splicing accuracy in metazoansuse asterix (*) to get italics
Florian Benitiere, Anamaria Necsulea, Laurent DuretPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2023
<p style="text-align: justify;">Most eukaryotic genes undergo alternative splicing (AS), but the overall functional significance of this process remains a controversial issue. It has been noticed that the complexity of organisms (assayed by the number of distinct cell types) &nbsp;correlates positively with their genome-wide AS rate. This has been interpreted as evidence that AS plays an important role in adaptive evolution by increasing the functional repertoires of genomes. However, this observation also fits with a totally opposite interpretation: given that ‘complex’ organisms tend to have small effective population sizes (<em>Ne</em>), they are expected to be more affected by genetic drift, and hence more prone to accumulate deleterious mutations that decrease splicing accuracy. Thus, according to this “drift barrier” theory, the elevated AS rate in complex organisms might simply result from a higher splicing error rate. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed 3,496 transcriptome sequencing samples to quantify AS in 53 metazoan species spanning a wide range of <em>Ne</em> values. Our results show a negative correlation between <em>Ne</em> proxies and the genome-wide AS rates among species, consistent with the drift barrier hypothesis. This pattern is dominated by low abundance isoforms, which represent the vast majority of the splice variant repertoire. We show that these low abundance isoforms are depleted in functional AS events, and most likely correspond to errors. Conversely, the AS rate of abundant isoforms, which are relatively enriched in functional AS events, tends to be lower in more complex species. All these observations are consistent with the hypothesis that variation in AS rates across metazoans reflects the limits set by drift on the capacity of selection to prevent gene expression errors.</p>
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8173126You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8173126You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8173126You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Alternative splicing, Random genetic drift, Life history traits, Effective population size, dNdS, Splice variants, Non-adaptive models, Ne
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, Genome Evolution, Molecular Evolution, Population Genetics / Genomics
Henrik Kaessmann h.kaessmann@zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de, Michael Lynch mlynch11@asu.edu, Philipp Khaitovich khaitovich@eva.mpg.de, Philipp Khaitovich khaitovich@eva.mpg.de, Margarida Cardoso-Moreira margarida.cardosomoreira@crick.ac.uk, Michael L Tress mtress@cnio.es, Jianzhi Zhang jianzhi@umich.ed, Alfonso Valencia alfonso.valencia@bsc.es, Way Sung wsung@uncc.edu No need for them to be recommenders of PCIEvolBiol. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]
2022-12-12 14:00:01
Ignacio Bravo
Anonymous