645

Title

Genomic relationships among diploid and polyploid species of the genus *Ludwigia* L. section *Jussiaea* using a combination of molecular cytogenetic, morphological, and crossing investigationsuse asterix (*) to get italics

Authors

D. Barloy, L. Portillo - Lemus, S. A. Krueger-Hadfield, V. Huteau, O. CoritonPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"

Year

2023

Picture

Abstract

<p>ABSTRACTThe genus Ludwigia L. sectionJussiaeais composed of a polyploid species complex with 2x, 4x, 6x and 10x ploidy levels, suggesting possible hybrid origins. The aim of the present study is to understand the genomic relationships among diploid and polyploid species in the section Jussiaea. Morphological and cytogenetic observations, controlled crosses, genomicin situhybridization (GISH), and flow cytometry were used to characterize species, ploidy levels, ploidy patterns, and genomic composition across taxa. Genome sizes obtained were in agreement with the diploid, tetraploid, hexaploid, and decaploid ploidy levels. Results of GISH showed that progenitors ofLudwigia stolonifera(4x) wereLudwigia peploidessubsp.montevidensis(2x) andLudwigia helminthorrhiza(2x), which also participated for one part (2x) to theLudwigia ascendensgenome (4x).Ludwigia grandiflorasubsp.hexapetala(10x) resulted from the hybridization betweenL. stolonifera(4x) andLudwigia grandiflorasubsp.grandiflora(6x). One progenitor ofL. grandiflorasubsp.grandiflorawas identified asL. peploides(2x). Our results suggest the existence of several processes of hybridization, leading to polyploidy, and possibly allopolyploidy, in the section Jussiaea due to the diversity of ploidy levels. The success of GISH opens up the potential for future studies to identify other missing progenitors inLudwigiaL. as well as other taxa.</p>

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these data (if you have any problems with the deposit of your data, please contact contact@evolbiol.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw data are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint.

You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these scripts (if you have any problems with the deposit of your scripts, please contact contact@evolbiol.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw scripts are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint.

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI, SWHID or URL) giving public access to these codes (if you have any problems with the deposit of your codes, please contact contact@evolbiol.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw codes are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint.

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Keywords

GISH, invasive plant, Ludwigia L., Onagraceae, polyploidy, phylogenetics

Methods that require specific expertise (optional)

NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).

Thematic fields

Hybridization / Introgression, Phylogenetics / Phylogenomics

Suggested reviewers - Suggest up to 10 reviewers (provide names and Email addresses). (Optional)

Malika Ainouche (mailla.ainouche@univ-rennes1.fr) (person who accepted to be recommender), Andrew LEITCH (a.r.leitch@qmul.ac.uk), Christian PARISOD (christian.parisod@ips.unibe.ch), Jesús M. CASTILLO (manucas@us.es), Andreas Hussner (hussner@igb-berlin.de ) No need for them to be recommenders of PCIEvolBiol. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct

Opposed reviewers - Suggest up to 5 people not to invite as reviewers. (Optional)

e.g. John Doe [john@doe.com]

Submission date

2023-01-11 13:47:18

Recommender

Malika AINOUCHE

Reviewers

or Register
Submit a preprint

MANAGING BOARD

Guillaume Achaz
Juan Arroyo
Trine Bilde
Dustin Brisson
Marianne Elias
Inês Fragata
Matteo Fumagalli
Tatiana Giraud
Frédéric Guillaume
Ruth Hufbauer
Sara Magalhaes
Caroline Nieberding
Michael David Pirie
Tanja Pyhäjärvi

Fernando Racimo
Tanja Schwander
Alejandro Gonzalez Voyer

RECOMMENDERS

MANAGING BOARD

MEMBER OF

INDEXED BY