141

Title *

Transgenerational cues about local mate competition affect offspring sex ratios in the spider mite Tetranychus urticaeuse asterix (*) to get italics

Authors *

Alison B. Duncan, Cassandra Marinosci, Céline Devaux, Sophie Lefèvre, Sara Magalhães, Joanne Griffin, Adeline Valente, Ophélie Ronce, Isabelle OlivieriPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"

Year *

2018

Picture *

Abstract *

<p style="text-align: justify;">In structured populations, competition between closely related males for mates, termed Local Mate Competition (LMC), is expected to select for female-biased offspring sex ratios. However, the cues underlying sex allocation decisions remain poorly studied. Here, we test for several cues in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae, a species that was previously found to adjust the sex ratio of its offspring in response to indicators of LMC. In particular, we investigate whether the offspring sex ratio of T. urticae females changes in response to 1) the current number of females laying eggs in the same patch, 2) the number of females in the patches of their mothers and 3) their relatedness to their mate. Females on patches with 1 (high LMC) or 15 (low LMC) other females produced similar sex ratios. Similarly, the offspring sex ratios of females mated with their brother did not differ with those of females mated with an unrelated male. In contrast, females produced a more female-biased offspring sex ratio if their mother laid eggs on a patch with 1 other female compared to 15 other females. Thus, the maternal environment is used as a cue affecting the sex allocation of daughters. We discuss the conditions under which the maternal environment can be a reliable predictor of inclusive fitness.</p>

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these data (if you have any problems with the deposit of your data, please contact contact@evolbiol.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw data are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint. *

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/240127v3.supplementary-materialYou should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI or URL) giving public access to these scripts (if you have any problems with the deposit of your scripts, please contact contact@evolbiol.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw scripts are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint. *

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Indicate the full web address (DOI, SWHID or URL) giving public access to these codes (if you have any problems with the deposit of your codes, please contact contact@evolbiol.peercommunityin.org). In case all raw codes are included in the preprint, indicate the DOI or URL of the preprint. *

You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://

Keywords (optional)

local mate competition, sex-ratio, sib-mating, haplodiploid

Methods that require specific expertise (optional)

NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).

Thematic fields *

Evolutionary Ecology, Life History

Suggested reviewers - Suggest up to 10 reviewers (provide names and Email addresses). (Optional)

e.g. John Doe john@doe.com

No need for them to be recommenders of PCIEvolBiol. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct

Opposed reviewers - Suggest up to 5 people not to invite as reviewers. (Optional)

e.g. John Doe john@doe.com

Submission date

2017-12-29 16:10:32

Recommender

Dries Bonte

Reviewers

or Register
Submit a preprint

MANAGING BOARD

Guillaume Achaz
Juan Arroyo
Trine Bilde
Dustin Brisson
Marianne Elias
Inês Fragata
Matteo Fumagalli
Tatiana Giraud
Frédéric Guillaume
Ruth Hufbauer
Sara Magalhaes
Caroline Nieberding
Michael David Pirie
Tanja Pyhäjärvi

Fernando Racimo
Tanja Schwander
Alejandro Gonzalez Voyer

RECOMMENDERS

FOLLOW US

MANAGING BOARD

MEMBER OF

INDEXED BY