Submit a preprint

635

The fate of recessive deleterious or overdominant mutations near mating-type loci under partial selfinguse asterix (*) to get italics
Emilie Tezenas, Tatiana Giraud, Amandine Veber, Sylvain BilliardPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2022
<p style="text-align: justify;">Large regions of suppressed recombination having extended over time occur in many organisms around genes involved in mating compatibility (sex-determining or mating-type genes). The sheltering of deleterious alleles has been proposed to be involved in such expansions. However, the dynamics of deleterious mutations partially linked to genes involved in mating compatibility are not well understood, especially in finite populations. In particular, under what conditions deleterious mutations are likely to be maintained for long enough near mating-compatibility genes remains to be evaluated, especially under selfing, which generally increases the purging rate of deleterious mutations. Using a branching process approximation, we studied the fate of a new deleterious or overdominant mutation in a diploid population, considering a locus carrying two permanently heterozygous mating-type alleles, and a partially linked locus at which the mutation appears. We obtained analytical and numerical results on the probability and purging time of the new mutation. We investigated the impact of recombination between the two loci and of the mating system (outcrossing, intra and inter-tetrad selfing) on the maintenance of the mutation. We found that the presence of a fungal-like mating-type locus (\textit{i.e.} not preventing diploid selfing) always sheltered the mutation under selfing, \textit{i.e.} it decreased the purging probability and increased the purging time of the mutations. The sheltering effect was higher in case of automixis (intra-tetrad selfing). This may contribute to explain why evolutionary strata of recombination suppression near the mating-type locus are found mostly in automictic (pseudo-homothallic) fungi. We also showed that rare events of deleterious mutation maintenance during strikingly long evolutionary times could occur, suggesting that deleterious mutations can indeed accumulate near the mating-type locus over evolutionary time scales. In conclusion, our results show that, although selfing purges deleterious mutations, these mutations can be maintained for very long times near a mating-type locus, which may contribute to promote the evolution of recombination suppression in sex-related chromosomes.</p>
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7464662You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Multitype branching process; Sheltering effect; Deleterious mutation; Mating-type locus; Selfing; Overdominance; Sex chromosome; Mating-type chromosome; Evolutionary strata; Automixis; Pseudo-homothallism; Extinction time
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Evolutionary Dynamics, Evolutionary Ecology, Evolutionary Theory, Genome Evolution, Population Genetics / Genomics, Reproduction and Sex
Janis Antonovics <ja8n@virginia.edu>, Denis Roze <roze@sb-roscoff.fr>, Sylvain Glémin <sylvain.glemin@univ-rennes1.fr>, Guillaume Achaz <guillaume.achaz@mnhn.fr>, Félix Foutel-Rodier <felix.foutel-rodier@college-de-france.fr>, Ellen Baake <ebaake@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>, Frederic Alberti <falberti@math.uni-bielefeld.de>, Aurélien Tellier <tellier@wzw.tum.de>, Emmanuelle Porcher <emmanuelle.porcher@mnhn.fr>, Mike Boots <mboots@berkeley.edu>
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCIEvolBiol. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
2022-10-10 13:50:30
Aurelien Tellier