Submit a preprint

72

An interaction between cancer progression and social environment in Drosophilause asterix (*) to get italics
Erika H. Dawson, Tiphaine P.M. Bailly, Julie Dos Santos , Céline Moreno, Maëlle Devilliers, Brigitte Maroni, Cédric Sueur, Andreu Casali, Beata Ujvari, Frederic Thomas, Jacques Montagne, Frederic MeryPlease use the format "First name initials family name" as in "Marie S. Curie, Niels H. D. Bohr, Albert Einstein, John R. R. Tolkien, Donna T. Strickland"
2017
The ecological benefits of sociality in gregarious species are widely acknowledged. However, only limited data is available on how the social environment influences non-communicable disease outcomes. For instance, despite extensive research over the past decades, the role of the social environment on cancer progression remains unclear and controversial. This is mainly because epidemiological studies suffer from the complexity of inter-correlated factors and it is still unknown whether distinct social group composition can also differentially affect tumor growth. Here, we exposed adult Drosophila with colorectal-like tumors to different social environments. We show that both cancerous flies bred in complete isolation, or in a group with non-cancerous individuals, exhibit increased tumor progression compared to those bred with other cancerous conspecifics. Based on video-tracking and social interaction analyses, we propose that this dramatic effect may be a consequence of perceived social isolation due to differential social interaction rates. We found that flies can discriminate between individuals at different stages of tumor growth; control flies actively avoid flies with cancer but only at the later stages of tumor development, whereas cancerous flies display strong social interactions with cancerous flies in the early stages of tumor growth. Our study demonstrates the reciprocal links between cancer and social interactions, as well as highlighting how sociality impacts health and fitness in animals and its potential implications for disease ecology and ecosystem dynamics.
You should fill this box only if you chose 'All or part of the results presented in this preprint are based on data'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Scripts were used to obtain or analyze the results'. URL must start with http:// or https://
You should fill this box only if you chose 'Codes have been used in this study'. URL must start with http:// or https://
Social interaction, group composition, cancer, drosophila, ecology of non-transmissible disease.
NonePlease indicate the methods that may require specialised expertise during the peer review process (use a comma to separate various required expertises).
Behavior & Social Evolution, Evolutionary Ecology, Phenotypic Plasticity
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
No need for them to be recommenders of PCIEvolBiol. Please do not suggest reviewers for whom there might be a conflict of interest. Reviewers are not allowed to review preprints written by close colleagues (with whom they have published in the last four years, with whom they have received joint funding in the last four years, or with whom they are currently writing a manuscript, or submitting a grant proposal), or by family members, friends, or anyone for whom bias might affect the nature of the review - see the code of conduct
e.g. John Doe john@doe.com
2017-05-30 08:55:16
Ana Rivero